Komoot 是使用 OSM 的德國戶外門戶網站與應用程式,其股份所有權發生了變化> 。據報導,布蘭登堡邦創新基金 (BFB Frühphasenfonds Brandenburg) 最初以 100 萬歐元的投資(佔總股份的 15%)支援該公司。這項投資現已變賣兌現,Karstadt Kaufhof 的 René Banko 與柏林的 June Fund 對此都表示了興趣。後者相當成功。
太平洋西北國家實驗室使用機器學習從路網與實際交通密度與行駛時間的資料估算大都市(洛杉磯)整個路網的交通密度> 。聽起來與 OSM 有關且非常有用,但您需要一台超級電腦。
Small correction: In context of the Facebook attribution discussion on talk i did not ask “other companies to take a stand”, i suggested *employees of companies* in the OSM context to take a stand independent of the position and the interests of their employer.
How could weeklyOSM not report on the biggest stories of the week, if not in years, the circulation of “A Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic Offensive Behaviour in the OSM Community.” The document has been signed by 36 organizations and over than 250 individuals. The document was circulated well before the election results which you published.
By not including the a report on the call to action weeklyOSM is making a statement, that the opinions of people who want a respectful community are not worth writing about.
I urge the editors of weeklyOSM to create there own ethical standards. I believe it’s the duty of the weeklyOSM editors is to seek truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.
Could you please include politeness into your ethical standards and submit news that you want to have in WeeklyOSM like we do?
Never heard of “A Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic Offensive Behaviour in the OSM Community.“ This news writers do this job in their free time and don’t make political statements, they maybe also didn’t hear about it. Maybe you should contribute by yourself to the osm news. It’s easy possible.
Unfortunately, we were not able to report on it by the deadline of Weekly #542 on December 7. Of course we follow every important news in the OSM world. We ask for your indulgence if a matter falls victim to the editorial deadline and thus does not appear until a week later.
The Weekly Editorial Team
It might just be the result of the WeeklyOSM editorial process: so as to provide sufficient time for translations, the submissions for the Sunday edition are automatically closed each Monday at 24:00 UTC, which means that a discussion occurring later during the week cannot be a story the following weekend.
The statement Clifford mentions and the discussion of it and Heather Leson’s oil-on-stormy-water comments on the list and at the AGM surely merit a full write-up?
They haven’t got even a passing mention: not a single woman is mentioned here.
I was wondering how big this issue is, but here’s some pretty clear evidence that it’s a problem.
Small correction: In context of the Facebook attribution discussion on talk i did not ask “other companies to take a stand”, i suggested *employees of companies* in the OSM context to take a stand independent of the position and the interests of their employer.
How could weeklyOSM not report on the biggest stories of the week, if not in years, the circulation of “A Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic Offensive Behaviour in the OSM Community.” The document has been signed by 36 organizations and over than 250 individuals. The document was circulated well before the election results which you published.
By not including the a report on the call to action weeklyOSM is making a statement, that the opinions of people who want a respectful community are not worth writing about.
I urge the editors of weeklyOSM to create there own ethical standards. I believe it’s the duty of the weeklyOSM editors is to seek truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.
https://osmbc.openstreetmap.de/osmww/wiki/Time-schedule
Could you please include politeness into your ethical standards and submit news that you want to have in WeeklyOSM like we do?
Never heard of “A Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic Offensive Behaviour in the OSM Community.“ This news writers do this job in their free time and don’t make political statements, they maybe also didn’t hear about it.
Maybe you should contribute by yourself to the osm news. It’s easy possible.
Unfortunately, we were not able to report on it by the deadline of Weekly #542 on December 7. Of course we follow every important news in the OSM world. We ask for your indulgence if a matter falls victim to the editorial deadline and thus does not appear until a week later.
The Weekly Editorial Team
It might just be the result of the WeeklyOSM editorial process: so as to provide sufficient time for translations, the submissions for the Sunday edition are automatically closed each Monday at 24:00 UTC, which means that a discussion occurring later during the week cannot be a story the following weekend.
The statement Clifford mentions and the discussion of it and Heather Leson’s oil-on-stormy-water comments on the list and at the AGM surely merit a full write-up?
They haven’t got even a passing mention: not a single woman is mentioned here.
I was wondering how big this issue is, but here’s some pretty clear evidence that it’s a problem.
One comment is not a huge issue